- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Secondary reinforcement as tertiary motivation: a revision of Hull's revision
Psychological Review 57 (6):362-374 (1950)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The logical status of Hull's principle of secondary reinforcement.F. J. McGuigan - 1956 - Psychological Review 63 (5):303-308.
The status of inhibition in Hull's system: A theoretical revision.H. Gwynne Jones - 1958 - Psychological Review 65 (3):179-182.
An analysis and revision of Hull's Theorem 30.A. C. Pereboom - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (4):234.
Toward a quantitative theory of secondary reinforcement.L. B. Wyckoff - 1959 - Psychological Review 66 (1):68-78.
A note on second-order conditioning—and secondary reinforcement.Gregory Razran - 1955 - Psychological Review 62 (5):327-332.
Durable secondary reinforcement: Method and theory.Donald W. Zimmerman - 1957 - Psychological Review 64 (6, Pt.1):373-383.
The role of secondary reinforcement in delayed reward learning.K. W. Spence - 1947 - Psychological Review 54 (1):1-8.
Addiction Motivation Reformulated: An Affective Processing Model of Negative Reinforcement.Timothy B. Baker, Megan E. Piper, Danielle E. McCarthy, Matthew R. Majeskie & Michael C. Fiore - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (1):33-51.
The conceptual categories of psychology; a suggestion for revision.Elizabeth Duffy - 1941 - Psychological Review 48 (3):177-203.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
16 (#1,056,769)
6 months
12 (#418,795)
2016-06-30
Downloads
16 (#1,056,769)
6 months
12 (#418,795)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6b65f85844-pflvk uwo