Review: Longuenesse, Kant on the human standpoint [Book Review]

Theoria 74 (1):79-85 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to the comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg.Henry Allison - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):182 – 194.
Kant's "I think" versus Descartes' "I am a thing that thinks".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 9--31.
Introduction.Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 1-8.
Cassam and Kant on "how possible" questions and categorial thinking.Beatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):510-517.
Review: Longuenesse, Kant on the Human Standpoint[REVIEW]Emily Carson - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (9).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
78 (#212,396)

6 months
2 (#1,185,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Camilla Serck-Hanssen
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references