Reply to the comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):182 – 194 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this discussion I respond to some of the criticisms raised by Béatrice Longuenesse and Hannah Ginsborg to my account of Kant's aesthetic theory presents in Kant's Theory of Taste

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Companion to Kant.Hannah Ginsborg (ed.) - 2006 - Blackwell.
Kant's theory of judgment, and judgments of taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's theory of taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
Kant’s Theory of Taste. [REVIEW]Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy 100 (9):487-492.
Kant's categories and the capacity to judge: Responses to Henry Allison and Sally Sedgwick.Beatrice Longuenesse - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):91 – 110.
Aesthetic judging and the intentionality of pleasure.Hannah Ginsborg - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):164 – 181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
106 (#162,080)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Henry E. Allison
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”.Melissa Zinkin - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (5):433-453.
Causation in Reflective Judgment.Michael Kurak - 2016 - Kant Studies Online (1):12-41.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references