Effective Concept Classes of PAC and PACi Incomparable Degrees, Joins and Embedding of Degrees

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 29 (2):298-299 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning is a machine learning model introduced by Leslie Valiant in 1984. The PACi reducibility refers to the PAC reducibility independent of size and computation time. This reducibility in PAC learning resembles the reducibility in Turing computability. The ordering of concept classes under PAC reducibility is nonlinear, even when restricted to particular concrete examples.Due to the resemblance to Turing Reducibility, we suspected that there could be incomparable PACi and PAC degrees for the PACi and PAC reducibilities as in Turing incomparable degrees. In 1957 Friedberg and in 1956 Muchnik independently solved the Post problem by constructing computably enumerable sets A and B of incomparable degrees using the priority construction method. We adapt this idea to PACi and PAC reducibilities and construct two effective concept classes C and D such that C is not reducible to D and vice versa. When considering PAC reducibility it was necessary to work on the size of an effective concept class, thus we use Kolmogorov complexity to obtain the size. The non-learnability of concept classes in the PAC learning model is explained by the existence of PAC incomparable degrees.Analogous to the Turing jump, we give a jump operation on effective concept classes for the zero jump. To define the zero jump operator for PACi degrees the join of all the effective concept classes is constructed and proved that it is a greatest element. There are many properties proven for existing degrees. Thus we can explore proving those properties to PACi and PAC degrees. But if we prove an embedding from those degrees to PACi and PAC degrees then those properties will be true for PACi and PAC degrees without explicitly proving them.Abstract prepared by Dodamgodage Gihnee M. Senadheera and taken directly from the thesisE-mail: [email protected]: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2717762461/abstract/ACD19F29A8774AF6PQ/1?accountid=13864.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bi-Isolation in the D.C.E. Degrees.Guohua Wu - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):409 - 420.
Bi-isolation in the d.c.e. degrees.Guohua Wu - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):409-420.
Some Special Pairs of Σ2 e-Degrees.Seema Ahmad & Alistair H. Lachlan - 1998 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (4):431-449.
Initial Segments of the Degrees of Ceers.Uri Andrews & Andrea Sorbi - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (3):1260-1282.
On the Symmetric Enumeration Degrees.Charles M. Harris - 2007 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 48 (2):175-204.
Isolation and lattice embeddings.Guohua Wu - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):1055-1064.
Hypersimplicity and semicomputability in the weak truth table degrees.George Barmpalias - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (8):1045-1065.
Degrees of difficulty of generalized r.e. separating classes.Douglas Cenzer & Peter G. Hinman - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (7-8):629-647.
Incomparable Vγ$V_\gamma$‐degrees.Teng Zhang - 2023 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 69 (1):58-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-30

Downloads
6 (#1,452,758)

6 months
4 (#779,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references