Moral uncertainty and the moral status of early human life

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):324-324 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Because a newborn baby does not have sufficiently complex psychological capacities to have a concept of continuation of life, according to Tooley, it cannot desire continuation of life, and thus cannot have a right to it.1 A similar position has been advocated by Kuhse and Singer2 ,3—and, more recently, by Giubilini and Minerva.4Key assumptions of Tooley are that being able to desire something is a necessary condition of having a right to it and having a concept of something is a necessary condition of being able to desire it. Despite their plausibility, these premises are at least open to question—that is, these are things that there can presumably be reasonable disagreement about. I …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
51 (#321,096)

6 months
5 (#710,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Selgelid
Monash University

Citations of this work

Moderate eugenics and human enhancement.Michael J. Selgelid - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (1):3-12.
On the moral status of hominins.C. S. Wareham - 2019 - Monash Bioethics Review 38 (2):205-218.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references