Public health, ethics, and functional foods

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):247-259 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Functional foods aim to provide a positive impact on health and well-being beyond their nutritive content. As such, they are likely candidates to enhance the public health official’s tool kit. Or are they? Although a very small number of functional foods (e.g., phytosterol-enriched margarine) show such promise in improving individual health that Dutch health insurance companies reimburse their costs to consumers, one must not draw premature conclusions about functional foods as a group. A large number of questions about individual products’ safety, efficacy, and affordability need to be answered before they might become an important part of the public health agenda. More importantly, though, the costs and benefits of functional foods relative to alternative mechanisms of public health improvement need to be ascertained. Alternative scenarios that warrant investigation are mainly the supply of nutraceutical ingredients in pill form targeting “at risk” groups and consumer education on diet and lifestyle.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#376,178)

6 months
8 (#351,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Doris Schroeder
University of Central Lancashire

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Mind 88 (350):305-309.
Social philosophy.Joel Feinberg - 1973 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Food Ethics: Paul Pojman , 2011, Wadsworth/cengage Learning.Ben Mepham - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):249-251.

Add more references