Philosophical and jurisprudential issues of vagueness

In Geert Keil & Ralf Poscher (eds.), Vagueness and Law: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schiffer on the epistemic theory of vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:505-517.
Vagueness in law: placing the blame where it's due.Diana Raffman - 2016 - In Geert Keil & Ralf Poscher (eds.), Vagueness and Law: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vagueness and Indirect Discourse.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2000 - Philosophical Issues 10 (1):258-270.
Vagueness and Law. Philosophical and Legal Perspectives.Geert Keil & Ralf Poscher - 2016 - In Geert Keil & Ralf Poscher (eds.), Vagueness and Law: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-20.
Stephen Schiffer's Theory of Vagueness.Paul Horwich - 2000 - Philosophical Issues 10 (1):271-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-10

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Schiffer
New York University

Citations of this work

Should Judges Justify Recourse to Broader Contexts When Interpreting Statutes?Daniel L. Feldman - 2020 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 34 (2):377-388.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references