Hypatia 24 (4):177 - 188 (2009)

Lisa H. Schwartzman
Michigan State University
In responding to Anderson, Tobin, and Mills, I focus on questions about non-ideal theory, normative individualism, and standpoint theory. In particular, I ask whether feminist theorizing can be "liberal" and yet not embody the problematic forms of abstraction and individualism described in "Challenging Liberalism". Ultimately, I call for methods of theorizing that illuminate and challenge oppressive social hierarchies
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01065.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

[Book Review] the Racial Contract. [REVIEW]Charles W. Mills - 1997 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):155-160.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Idealizing Morality.Lisa Tessman - 2010 - Hypatia 25 (4):797 - 824.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Idealizing Morality.Lisa Tessman - 2010 - Hypatia 25 (4):797 - 824.
Theorizing Feminisms: A Reader.Elizabeth Hackett & Sally Haslanger (eds.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Re-Thinking Intersectionality.Jennifer C. Nash - 2008 - Feminist Review 89 (1):1-15.


Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #182,384 of 2,498,947 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,947 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes