Authors
Lisa Tessman
State University of New York at Binghamton
Abstract
This paper considers whether eudaimonism is necessarily an idealizing approach to ethics. I argue, contrary to what is implied by Christine Swanton, that it is not, and I suggest that a non-ideal eudaimonistic virtue ethics can be useful for feminist and critical race theorists. For eudaimonist theorists in the Aristotelian tradition, the claim that one should aim to live virtuously assumes that there will typically be good enough background conditions so that an exercise of the virtues, in conjunction with these favorable external conditions, will suffice for someone to flourish both in the sense of living virtuously and in the sense of living well or living the good life. However, under some forms of oppression the background conditions will not be good enough, and thus an exercise of the virtues will often be insufficient to constitute a flourishing life. It may seem that eudaimonism, with its foregrounding of the concept of flourishing and its assumption of a tight connection between living virtuously and living well, may function as a form of ideology that elides the ways in which non-ideal and oppressive conditions can separate virtue from well-being and can make the state of flourishing (in its dual senses) unattainable. I point out that eudaimonism can be revised to incorporate the claim that virtue and flourishing may typically be unlinked, and I advocate retaining flourishing as an unattainable end, exercising the virtues even with a sense of their absurdity, and confronting the existential states of frustration and disappointment that may result.
Keywords virtue  eudaimonism  non-ideal theory  feminist ethics  flourishing  eudaimonia  virtue ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Capacious Account of Liberal Feminism.R. Baehr Amy - 2017 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 3 (1).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Critical Virtue Ethics: Understanding Oppression as Morally Damaging.Lisa Tessman - 2001 - In Peggy DesAutels & Joanne Waugh (eds.), Feminists Doing Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield.
Is Virtue Ethics Self-Effacing?Glen Pettigrove - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):191-207.
Wolterstorff on Love and Justice. [REVIEW]Joseph Clair - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):138-167.
Intelligent Virtue.Julia Annas - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Idealizing Morality.Lisa Tessman - 2010 - Hypatia 25 (4):797 - 824.
Eudaimonism and Virtue.William J. Prior - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (3):325-342.
Virtue and Eudaimonism.Julia Annas - 1998 - Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (1):37.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-02-21

Total views
99 ( #116,591 of 2,498,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #171,114 of 2,498,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes