Hume’s Paradoxical Thesis and His Critics

Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (2):65-72 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hume warns his readers that his view on necessity will not be understood by his critics. As he sees it, his view is paradoxical: Necessity is "nothing but an internal impression of the mind, or a determination to carry our thought from one object to another". Recent critics find it difficult to accept Hume's view and have done their best to interpret it in their way. My paper is a critical investigation of the attempts by Pears, Baier and Stoud to "rescue" Hume from his own folly.

Similar books and articles

Hume, induction, and the irish.D. C. Stove - 1976 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (2):140 – 147.
Hume's Impression of Will.Joshua M. Wood - 2017 - Hume Studies 43 (1):91-116.
Hume on Spatial Contiguity.Wade Robison - 1995 - Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (2):49-64.
"Hume's Reasons".Aaron Zimmerman - 2007 - Hume Studies 2 (33):211-256.
Hume on Thick and Thin Causation.Alexander Bozzo - 2018 - Dissertation, Marquette University

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
289 (#9,383)

6 months
88 (#188,209)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Schwerin
Rice University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references