Theoria 86 (6):843-858 (2020)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
What is the value of art? Standard responses draw on the different kinds of value that we tend to ascribe to individual artworks. In that context, none have been more significant than aesthetic value and moral value. To understand what makes an artwork valuable we then need to examine the interaction between these two kinds of value and how this contributes to the artwork's final value. The main aim of this article is to highlight two areas of concern for interaction theories, in order to improve our understanding of the dynamic relations between kinds of value in art. In the first instance, I shall outline the main tenets of the three leading interaction theories. Next, I shall discuss what it might mean to say that an artwork has moral value, in an attempt to establish on what grounds interaction theories base their central claims. Subsequently, I will look at how our conception of art's moral value affects the possibility of a bona fide form of value interaction, or one capable of shaping a work's final value in conjunction with its aesthetic value. Finally, I shall turn to a discussion of the notion of aesthetic value.
|
Keywords | aesthetic value, moral value, art |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/theo.12294 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Ethical Criticism of Art.Berys Gaut - 1998 - In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge University Press. pp. 182--203.
Morals in Fiction and Fictional Morality (I).Kendall Lewis Walton - 1994/2015 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 68:27-50.
View all 31 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On Judging the Moral Value of Narrative Artworks.James Harold - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2):259–270.
Moral Metaphorics, or Kant After Blumenberg: Towards an Analysis of the Aesthetic Settings of Morality.Alison Ross - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 104 (1):40-58.
On the Meeting of the Moral and the Aesthetic in Literary Education.Andrés Mejía & Silvia Eugenia Montoya - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (2):370-386.
Rationality and Moral Autonomy: An Essay in Moral Psychology.Laurence Thomas - 1983 - Synthese 57 (2):249 - 266.
The Role of Aesthetic Competence for Moral Discernment.Patricia Trentacoste - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):34-40.
The Morality of Art: Collingwood's View.Christopher Dreisbach - 1987 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties. Smuts - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
Moral Perception and Its Evaluative Dimension.Xinyan Jiang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:215-220.
Evaluating Art: Morally Significant Imagining Versus Moral Soundness.Amy Mullin - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):137–149.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-11-12
Total views
35 ( #327,301 of 2,518,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,290 of 2,518,090 )
2020-11-12
Total views
35 ( #327,301 of 2,518,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,290 of 2,518,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads