Evaluating Art Morally

Theoria 86 (6):843-858 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the value of art? Standard responses draw on the different kinds of value that we tend to ascribe to individual artworks. In that context, none have been more significant than aesthetic value and moral value. To understand what makes an artwork valuable we then need to examine the interaction between these two kinds of value and how this contributes to the artwork's final value. The main aim of this article is to highlight two areas of concern for interaction theories, in order to improve our understanding of the dynamic relations between kinds of value in art. In the first instance, I shall outline the main tenets of the three leading interaction theories. Next, I shall discuss what it might mean to say that an artwork has moral value, in an attempt to establish on what grounds interaction theories base their central claims. Subsequently, I will look at how our conception of art's moral value affects the possibility of a bona fide form of value interaction, or one capable of shaping a work's final value in conjunction with its aesthetic value. Finally, I shall turn to a discussion of the notion of aesthetic value.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Metaphorics: Kant after Blumenberg.Alison Ross - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 104 (1):40-58.
How Not to Defend Response Moralism.Aaron Smuts - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 49 (4):19-38.
Moral dilemmas.Mark Sainsbury - 2009 - Think 8 (22):57-63.
On judging the moral value of narrative artworks.James Harold - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2):259–270.
The Role of Aesthetic Competence for Moral Discernment.Patricia Trentacoste - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):34-40.
The Morality of Art: Collingwood's View.Christopher Dreisbach - 1987 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties.Aaron Smuts - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
Moral Perception and Its Evaluative Dimension.Xinyan Jiang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:215-220.
The Use of Moral Concepts in Literary Criticism.Eric Gilman - 1966 - Philosophy 41 (158):304 - 319.
Evaluating art: Morally significant imagining versus moral soundness.Amy Mullin - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):137–149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-12

Downloads
61 (#259,793)

6 months
11 (#226,317)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elisabeth Schellekens
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Morals in Fiction and Fictional Morality (I).Kendall Lewis Walton - 2015 [1994] - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 68:27-50.
Art, emotion and ethics.Berys Nigel Gaut - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The ethical criticism of art.Berys Gaut - 1998 - In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge University Press. pp. 182--203.
Art, Emotion and Ethics.Berys Gaut - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):199-201.
Moderate moralism.Noël Carroll - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):223-238.

View all 32 references / Add more references