Abstract

I argue in this thesis that Hegel's work provides the basis for the categorization and evaluation of historical epochs which are distinct and separate cultures. In order to prove this contention I present an interpretation of Hegel's philosophy that yields a coherent account of the different aspects of Hegel's philosophy of culture. This is necessary considering the array of different views on Hegel's philosophy that exist. The principles of Hegel's philosophical and historical discussions are then employed to gain insight into cultural and historical phenomena including post-Hegelian developments. ;The thesis first explores reasons for different readings of Hegel. This discussion is accompanied by an explanation of Hegelian terms and philosophical assumptions. I argue that Hegel's philosophy allows for the evaluation of different cultures, which is usually considered to be an impossible task due to the historical situation or cultural affiliation of any researcher. Furthermore, I maintain that this aspect of Hegelian philosophy makes it difficult to classify Hegel as a modern, a post-modern or even a post post-modern thinker. ;It is a well known fact that Hegel's categorization of history is marred by inconsistencies. However, this defect can be remedied using Hegel's own philosophical presuppositions. Consequently, the thesis first presents Hegel's ordering of historical epochs based on a literal reading of his Philosophy of History. Second, I develop an hypothetical ordering of history which is constructed in accordance with Hegel's philosophical outlook. The hypothetical historical model reveals that Hegel's Prussia does not constitute the stage of absolute knowing and that humanity is still on its way towards this stage