Reply to Ohad Nachtomy’s Review of Real Alternatives

The Leibniz Review 12:99-102 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leibniz maintained that even though God knows absolutely for certain that an individual will actually act in a certain way, the individual could act otherwise. In my book I argue that Leibniz meant both that God consistently conceives of actual individuals acting otherwise and that God has the efficient power, even if not, in the end, the will power, to execute those conceptions. I also argue that the seemingly intractable feeling philosophers such as Nachtomy have that Leibniz’s doctrine of complete concepts precludes this “real alternative” conception of di vine creative freedom is due to their misrepresenting or distorting that doctrine.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Real Alternatives. [REVIEW]Ohad Nachtomy - 2002 - The Leibniz Review 12:89-97.
Reply to Stefano Di Bella.Ohad Nachtomy - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:151-156.
Reply to Ohad Nachtomy.Anne-Lise Rey - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:175-177.
Remarks on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676.Ohad Nachtomy - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:249-257.
Leibniz and The Logic of Life.Ohad Nachtomy - 2009 - Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
9 (#1,249,590)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references