- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Threat ≠ prevention, challenge ≠ promotion: The impact of threat, challenge and regulatory focus on attention to negative stimuli
Cognition and Emotion 29 (1):188-195 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Consumer Ethics: The Role of Self-Regulatory Focus.Tine De Bock & Patrick Van Kenhove - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):241 - 255.
The prevalence of typical dream themes challenges the specificity of the threat simulation theory.Anne Germain, Tore A. Nielsen, Antonio Zadra & Jacques Montplaisir - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):940-941.
Evaluating stress as a challenge is associated with superior attentional control and motor skill performance: Testing the predictions of the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat.Samuel J. Vine, Paul Freeman, Lee J. Moore, Roy Chandra-Ramanan & Mark R. Wilson - 2013 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 19 (3):185.
Health Promotion and the Freedom of the Individual.Gary Taylor & Helen Hawley - 2006 - Health Care Analysis 14 (1):15-24.
Saving Time: How Attention Explains the Utility of Supposedly Superfluous Representations.Jason Ford - 2009 - Cognitive Critique 1 (1):101-114.
Threats to military professionalism: international perspectives.Douglas Lindsay & Jeff Stouffer (eds.) - 2012 - Kingston, Ont.: Canadian Defence Academy Press.
The Effect of Leadership Style, Framing, and Promotion Regulatory Focus on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior.Katrina A. Graham, Jonathan C. Ziegert & Johnna Capitano - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 126 (3):423-436.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-25
Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)
6 months
3 (#1,002,413)
2014-03-25
Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)
6 months
3 (#1,002,413)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The influence of motivational and mood states on visual attention: A quantification of systematic differences and casual changes in subjects' focus of attention.Stefanie Hüttermann & Daniel Memmert - 2015 - Cognition and Emotion 29 (3):471-483.
References found in this work
Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: Positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing.Susanne Schwager & Klaus Rothermund - 2013 - Cognition and Emotion 27 (5):839-855.
Incongruency effects in affective processing: Automatic motivational counter-regulation or mismatch-induced salience?Klaus Rothermund, Anne Gast & Dirk Wentura - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (3):413-425.
The Experience of Regret and Disappointment.Marcel Zeelenberg, Wilco W. van Dijk, Antony S. R. Manstead & Joopvan der Pligt - 1998 - Cognition and Emotion 12 (2):221-230.
On the dynamics of implicit emotion regulation: Counter-regulation after remembering events of high but not of low emotional intensity.Susanne Schwager & Klaus Rothermund - 2014 - Cognition and Emotion 28 (6):971-992.
Differentiating emotions in relation to deserved or undeserved outcomes: A retrospective study of real-life events.N. T. Feather & Ian R. McKee - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (5):955-977.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo