The penetrating of the ideas of the philosophy into the special sciences

Filosoficky Casopis 28 (2):190-200 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary on Jaegwon Kim, "Laws, Causation, and Explanation in the Special Sciences".Michael Sollberger - 2005 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27 (3/4):339 - 344.
A Theory of Non-universal Laws.Alexander Reutlinger - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):97 - 117.
Laws, Causation, and Explanation in the Special Sciences.Jaegwon Kim - 2005 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27 (3/4):325 - 338.
Special Sciences.Carl Gillett - 2006 - In D. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Macmillan Reference.
Why is there anything except physics?Barry Loewer - 2009 - Synthese 170 (2):217 - 233.
Penetrating the impenetrable.Georges Rey - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):149-150.
15 How Special Are Special Sciences?Antonella Corradini - 2010 - In Antonella Corradini & Timothy O'Connor (eds.), Emergence in science and philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 6--289.
Explanation and invariance in the special sciences.James Woodward - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):197-254.
Non‐committal Causal Explanations.David Pineda - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):147-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-10

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references