Michael Sollberger
University of Lausanne
In the present commentary on Jaegwon Kim's Laws, Causation, and Explanation in the Special Sciences, I first give a short summary of the global problem. In a second step, I go on to sum up and comment on the three arguments which Kim gives to the disadvantage of 'strict' special-science laws. In so doing, I shall focus on the question whether ceteris paribus laws can still apply in special sciences
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Laws, Causation, and Explanation in the Special Sciences.Jaegwon Kim - 2005 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27 (3/4):325 - 338.
Against Laws in the Special Sciences.Jaegwon Kim - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (Supplement):103-122.
A Theory of Non-Universal Laws.Alexander Reutlinger - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):97 - 117.
Natural Laws in Scientific Practice.Marc Lange - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Anomalous Monism, Ceteris Paribus, and Psychological Explanation.Robert Klee - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):389-403.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #772,591 of 2,519,861 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,861 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes