The Theory-Dependence of Observation

Cogito 13 (3):201-206 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the theoretical dependence of correspondence postulates.James Child - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):170-177.
The scientists' criterion of true observation.D. G. Ellson - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (1):41-52.
Observation reconsidered.Jerry Fodor - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (March):23-43.
Why worry about theory‐dependence? Circularity, minimal empiricality and reliability.Matthias Adam - 2004 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3):117 – 132.
Observation And Objectivity.Harold I. Brown - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Truth-makers and dependence.David Liggins - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge University Press. pp. 254.
Observation and Growth in Scientific Knowledge.Robert Nola - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:245 - 257.
Theory, observation, and drama.Simon Blackburn - 1992 - Mind and Language 7 (1-2):187-203.
Rousseau on Dependence and the Formation of Political Society.David James - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):343-366.
Empirical testing.Harold I. Brown - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):353 – 399.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
147 (#128,468)

6 months
8 (#367,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Howard Sankey
University of Melbourne

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references