Environmental Values 15 (1):69 - 84 (2006)
AbstractIt is sometimes claimed that as members of the species Homo sapiens we have a responsibility to promote the good of Homo sapiens itself (distinct from the good of its individual members). Lawrence Johnson has recently defended this claim as part of his approach to resolving the problem of future generations. We show that there are several difficulties with Johnson's argument, many of which are likely to attend any attempt to establish the moral considerability of Homo sapiens or species generally. Further, even if Homo sapiens were morally considerable, this would not ground an adequate response to the problem of future generations. The sort of moral considerability that would be appropriate to Homo sapiens, or species generally, would not be as robust nor have the implications that many have supposed
Similar books and articles
Homo Sapiens, a Localized Species.Jerome Bruner - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):694-695.
Moral Transhumanism.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6):656-669.
Genetic Engineering and the Speciation of Superions From Humans.Lucas Alexander Haley Commons-Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Geoffrey David Commons - 2008 - World Futures 64 (5-7):436 – 443.
The Earliest Homo Sapiens (Sapiens): Biological, Chronological and Taxonomic Perspectives.Anne-Marie Tillier - 2007 - Diogenes 54 (2):110 - 121.
Cento e quarenta anons sem Charles Darwin bastam: sobre variedades, espécies, e definições.Ricardo Wainzbort - 2000 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 4 (1):141-184.
Future Generations and Contemporary Ethics.Lawrence E. Johnson - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (4):471 - 487.
Mental Attention, Not Language, May Explain Evolutionary Growth of Human Intelligence and Brain Size.Juan Pascual-Leone - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):19-20.
Ecological Dominance and the Final Sprint in Hominid Evolution.Pouwel Slurink - 1993 - Human Evolution.
On Species Individualism: A New Defense of the Species-as-Individuals Hypothesis.Keith A. Coleman & E. O. Wiley - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (4):498-517.
The Cerebral Torque and Directional Asymmetry for Hand Use Are Correlates of the Capacity for Language in Homo Sapiens.Timothy J. Crow - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):595-596.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Should We Bring Back the Passenger Pigeon? The Ethics of De-Extinction.T. J. Kasperbauer - 2017 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 20 (1):1-14.
Is Artefactualness a Value-Relevant Property of Living Things?Ronald Sandler - 2012 - Synthese 185 (1):89-102.
References found in this work
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.