Equality and Justice in Early Greek Cosmologies: The Paradigm of the “Line of the Horizon”

Философия И Космология 18:22-31 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The founders of Greek scientific thought believed justice in terms of equality. Cosmic equality, in fact, was conceived as the guaranty of cosmic justice: the order of nature is maintained because it is an order of equals. That the main components of the universe are equal was an old tradition in popular cosmology. In Hesiod earth and sky are declared equal ; and the distance between sky and earth is equal to that between earth and Tartarus. Anaximander’s own cosmology is designed with just such a sense of aesthetic symmetry, with equality as the main motif: the intervals between each of the infinite worlds are equal; the intervals between earth, fixed stars, moon, and sun are also equal; earth and sun are equal. This is exactly the sense in which equality figures in the whole development of early cosmological theory from Anaximander to Empedocles: powers are equal if they can hold another in check, in a way that no one of them is more powerful than any other. The objective of this paper is to propose a cosmological interpretation of the term díkē in ancient Greek according to Aristotle, who establishes synonymy between justice and equality through the use of the «dividing line» paradigm. Aristotle reveals, in effect, that the words diksastḗs «judge» and dikaion «just» come from the root díkē, «judgment or sentence», which in their turn are derived from the adverb dīksā, «division into two equal parts». Moreover, the adverb dīksā comes from the Greek root dís-, «divided into two parts, dichotomous», which in its turn is derived from the Sanskrit root *diś- whose meaning indicates the astronomical concept of the «horizon line», — i.e. the boundary line that divides apparently the cosmos in two equal parts, the Earth and the Sky. As said by Palmer and Gagarin, in effect, the meaning of the word Díkē is associated with making a «judgment or decision» between two contestants, that is, placing a «dividing line» between them. Furthermore, this original conception representing justice as a division of the cosmos into two equal parts, or cosmic dasmós, has its roots in ancient cosmogony not only Greek but also Indo-Iranian, Hindus, Old Persian, Egyptian, Babylonian and Chinese. To conclude, according to my research, also Plato could have used the paradigm of the «Line of the horizon» to explain his cosmological Doctrine of Ideas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hipótesis sobre el origen etimológico de la palabra díkē: la analogía del horizonte.Maria Antonietta Salamone - 2013 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 46:307-327.
Colloquium 2: Two Stages Of Early Greek Cosmology.Daniel W. Graham - 2013 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 28 (1):41-63.
Greek cosmologies.Geoffrey Er Lloyd - 1975 - In Carmen Blacker, Michael Loewe & J. Martin Plumley (eds.), Ancient Cosmologies. Allen & Unwin. pp. 224.
Equality and justice.Peter Vallentyne (ed.) - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
On Law and Justice Attributed to Archytas of Tarentum.Johnson Monte & P. S. Horky - 2020 - In David Conan Wolfsdorf (ed.), Early Greek Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 455-490.
Equality in worth as a pre-condition for justice in greek thought.Rui Zhu - 2003 - History of Political Thought 24 (1):1-15.
Forget about equality.Madison Powers - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144.
When Justice Demands Inequality.John Thrasher & Keith Hankins - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-05

Downloads
4 (#1,619,724)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Modernity and war: Anthropological approach in polemology.A. A. Kravchenko & O. V. Starovoit - 2018 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 13:79-86.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references