Democracy, Emergency, and Arbitrary Coercion: A Liberal Republican View

Boston, MA: Brill (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Liberal democracies deal poorly with states of emergency because they underestimate the corrosive effect of arbitrary coercion on established liberal democratic values. Far from protecting the rights of citizens, arbitrary emergency measures undermine citizens’ rights

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democracy and the neo‐liberal promotion of arbitrary power.Barry Hindess - 2000 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):68-84.
The Rule of Law in Times of Crisis.Andrej J. Zwitter - 2012 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 98 (1):95-111.
‘Liberal Democracy’ in the ‘Post-Corona World’.Shirzad Peik - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 14 (31):1-29.
Property‐Owning Democracy, Liberal Republicanism, and the Idea of an Egalitarian Ethos.Alan Thomas - 2012-02-17 - In Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.), Property‐Owning Democracy. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 101–128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-06

Downloads
35 (#121,482)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nick C. Sagos
Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references