Sentience and Sapience: The Place of Enactive Cognitive Science in Sellarsian Philosophy of Mind

In David Pereplyotchik & Deborah R. Barnbaum (eds.), Sellars and Contemporary Philosophy. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 104-119 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that Sellars's philosophy of perception can be reconciled with recent work in enactive cognitive science. Sellars's critical realism holds that we perceive physical objects with perceptible properties as causally mediated by how these objects affect our sensory receptors. I argue that this theory, while basically right, downplays the role of embodiment in perception: perception essentially involves sensorimotor abilities. I argue that embodied critical realism can resolve the debate between Coates and Noe.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume and the enactive approach to mind.Tom Froese - 2009 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (1):95-133.
The enactive approach: a briefer statement, with some remarks on “radical enactivism”.Alva Noë - 2021 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (5):957-970.
Extensive enactivism: why keep it all in?Daniel D. Hutto, Michael D. Kirchhoff & Erik Myin - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (706):102178.
Realism Redux: Gibson's Affordances Get a Well-Deserved Update.T. Ziemke - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (1):87-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-07

Downloads
372 (#53,332)

6 months
155 (#21,414)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carl Sachs
Marymount University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations