How Much Adhikāra Does a Commentator Have to Interpret a Śāstra Text

Philosophy East and West 70 (2):469-484 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines the question of the freedom that a commentator has while commenting on a philosophical sūtra text. The texts covered are Gautama's Nyāyasūtras, Is'varakṛṣṣa's Sāṁkhyakārikā, and Patañjali's Yogasūtras.It is well known that every commentator believes that s/he is the one who has understood the true intention of the original author and therefore employs some interpretative tools to bring out the meaning of the text s/he is commenting on. Generally there are three devices that are commonly employed. One is to supply some additional points that the commentator believes are missing in the sūtra text so as logically to connect the main ideas contained in the original text for clarity of the concept...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Political Interpretations of the Lotus Sūtra.James Mark Shields - 2013 - In Steven M. Emmanuel (ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 512–523.
Nyāya sūtra =. Gautama - 1977 - New York, NY: Routledge. Edited by Vittorio A. van Bijlert & Gautama.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-12

Downloads
10 (#1,221,969)

6 months
2 (#1,259,626)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references