Why computers can't act

American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (2):157-163 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To be an agent, one must be able to formulate intentions. To be able to formulate intentions, one must have a first-person perspective. Computers lack a first-person perspective. So, computers are not agents.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Issues in Computer Ethics for Non-Programmers.Mark E. Wunderlich - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):255-264.
Education for Computers.Robert D. Heslep - 2011 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (4):357-364.
Nonconceptual self-consciousness and agency: Perspective and access.Susan L. Hurley - 1998 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 30 (3-4):207-247.
Persons, social agency, and constitution.Robert A. Wilson - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):49-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
123 (#146,413)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lynne Rudder Baker
PhD: Vanderbilt University; Last affiliation: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references