Ethical Protagoreanism

In Socrates, pleasure, and value. New York: Oxford University Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Gorgias seems to attack hedonism; the Protagoras seems to defend it. The resolution to this apparent inconsistency is to deny that the Gorgias attacks hedonism, in general. I argue that the target attacked in the Gorgias is hedonism of apparent pleasure: an ethical Protagoreanism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hedonism in Plato's Protagoras and Gorgias.Richard Alan Bidgood - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Socrates, Pleasure and Value. [REVIEW]Donald J. Zeyl - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):490-492.
Socrates, pleasure, and value.George Rudebusch - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Pleasure, Virtue, and Happiness in the Gorgias.Daniel Russell - 2005 - In Daniel C. Russell (ed.), Plato on pleasure and the good life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Socrates, Pleasure and Value. [REVIEW]Hugo Meynell - 2002 - Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):647-648.
Epicurean Hedonism as Qualitative Hedonism.Andrew Alwood - 2018 - Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (4):411-427.
The Argument of The Gorgias.Terence Irwin - 1995 - In Plato's ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Hilding Rudebusch
Northern Arizona University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references