Socrates, Pleasure and Value [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):490-492 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

George Rudebusch’s book, Socrates, Pleasure and Value is a richly textured book whose central aim is to resolve the dispute. On the one hand, Rudebusch sides with the proponents of in holding that the hedonism of the Protagoras is Socrates’ own considered position, clearly distinct from the hedonism refuted in the Gorgias, despite evident verbal similarities. On the other, he agrees with the proponents of that for Socrates virtue is the supreme intrinsic human good. He thus accepts the burden of reconciling the claim that pleasure is the only intrinsic good with the claim that virtue is the supreme intrinsic good.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Socrates, pleasure, and value.George Rudebusch - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Argument of the Philebus.Joe McCoy - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):1-16.
Socrates and Callicles on Pleasure.Scott Berman - 1991 - Phronesis 36 (2):117-140.
Malicious pleasure evaluated: Is pleasure an unconditional good?Irwin Goldstein - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):24–31.
Socrates, Pleasure, and Value. [REVIEW]Daniel C. Russell - 2000 - Ancient Philosophy 20 (2):468-472.
Socrates, Pleasure and Value. [REVIEW]Hugo Meynell - 2002 - Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):647-648.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
21 (#720,615)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references