Controversy, Context, and Theory: David Zarefsky on Political Argumentation

Argumentation 30 (2):213-215 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10503-015-9363-5

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky: Heidelberg: Springer, 2014, pp. xix, 265.Jeanne Fahnestock - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):207-211.
Commentary on: David Zarefsky's "The 'comeback' second Obama-Romney debate and the virtues of argumentation".Robert C. Rowland - unknown
Willard's A Theory of Argumentation.David Zarefsky - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (3).
Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation.David Zarefsky - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):317-330.
Obituary: Michael Leff (1941–2010). [REVIEW]David Zarefsky - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):403-404.
Predicaments of Communication, Argument, and Power: Towards a Critical Theory of Controversy.G. Thomas Goodnight - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (2):119-137.
Comments on 'Strategic Maneuvering in Question Time in the British House of Commons'.David Zarefsky - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):395-397.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]David Zarefsky, Willen J. Witteveen, Charles Arthur Willard, Thomas A. Hollihan & A. J. F. K.�Bben - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (4):669-685.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.
Commentary on: Christian Kock's "Virtue reversed: Principal argumentative vices in political debate".David Zarefsky - unknown
Purpose, Argument Fields, and Theoretical Justification.Robert C. Rowland - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):235-250.
Eemeren & Garssen's Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory.Frank Zenker - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (4):449-479.
Argumentation and Transformation.Maeve Cooke - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (1):81-110.
The 'comeback' second Obama-Romney debate and virtues of argumentation.David Zarefsky - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-09

Downloads
38 (#420,102)

6 months
7 (#431,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references