The Superject and Moral Responsibility

Review of Metaphysics 10 (2):201 - 206 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dynamic aspect of Whitehead's doctrine leads him not only to reject the firstness of the subject, but also to make the subject emerge out of an encounter between the datum and the feelings; and what is united in the subject becomes a late or progressive attainment. There are actually stressed two priorities as against the secondarity of the subject: the priority of the datum and that of the feeling. The term "superject" connotes in this context the emerging quality of the unity of the subject, its going beyond the datum towards the unity. "The feelings are inseparable from the end at which they aim; and this end is the feeler".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Nexus of Care.Barry R. Sang - 2007 - Process Studies 36 (2):229-244.
Moral responsibility, authenticity, and education.Ishtiyaque Haji - 2008 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Stefaan E. Cuypers.
Responsibility.Garrath Williams - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Price of Frankfurt’s Compatibalism.Bindu Madhok - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:577-584.
Perspectives on moral responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza (eds.) - 1993 - Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
The moral responsibility of the hospital.Richard T. De George - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):87-100.
Moral responsibility in collective contexts.Tracy Isaacs - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
10 (#1,194,003)

6 months
2 (#1,198,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references