Can Genetic Nondiscrimination Laws Save Lives?

Hastings Center Report 51 (1):6-7 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Numerous state laws and the federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) have been enacted to prevent or redress genetic discrimination in employment and health insurance, but laws protecting against genetic discrimination in life insurance have been less common and weak. Consequently, some individuals with a genetic risk of a serious illness have declined presymptomatic genetic testing, thereby decreasing their prevention and treatment options and increasing their mortality risk. In 2020, Florida became the first state to prohibit life insurance companies from using the results of presymptomatic genetic tests in underwriting. Although the law was “only” intended to prevent genetic discrimination, a possible or even likely consequence of the law will be to encourage timely genetic testing by at‐rick individuals and thereby save lives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genetic Exceptionalism and Legislative Pragmatism.Mark A. Rothstein - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (S2):59-65.
A Defense of Genetic Discrimination.Noah Levin - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (4):33-42.
Genetic Nondiscrimination and Health Care as an Entitlement.B. M. Kious - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-15

Downloads
5 (#1,562,182)

6 months
1 (#1,516,021)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The dangerous use of genetic information.David Eugene Johnson & Debora Jane Shaw - 2023 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 21 (4):533-549.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references