Was Pindar Pious? - Erich Thummer: Die Religiosität Pindars. (Commentationes Aenipontanae.) Pp. 137. Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag Wagner, 1957. Paper, ö. S. 145 [Book Review]

The Classical Review 9 (3):231-233 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0009840x00173275

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Was Pindar Pious? - Erich Thummer: Die Religiosität Pindars. (Commentationes Aenipontanae.) Pp. 137. Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag Wagner, 1957. Paper, ö. S. 145.H. J. Rose - 1959 - The Classical Review 9 (03):231-.
Was Pindar Pious? - Erich Thummer: Die Religiosität Pindars. (Commentationes Aenipontanae.) Pp. 137. Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag Wagner, 1957. Paper, ö. S. 145. [REVIEW]H. J. Rose - 1959 - The Classical Review 9 (3):231-233.
The ‘Theban Eagle’.Richard Stoneman - 1976 - Classical Quarterly 26 (2):188-197.
The 'Theban Eagle'.Richard Stoneman - 1976 - Classical Quarterly 26 (02):188-.
The Epigram on Pindar's Death.H. J. Rose - 1931 - Classical Quarterly 25 (2):121-122.
Pindar, Pythian Xl.C. M. Bowra - 1936 - Classical Quarterly 30 (3-4):129-141.
Pindar, Pythian Xl.C. M. Bowra - 1936 - Classical Quarterly 30 (3-4):129-.
Pindar: Menschenlos und Wende der Zeit.Michael Theunissen - 2000 - C.H.Beck.
Pindar Again W. J. Slater: Lexicon to Pindar. Pp. xiv + 563. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1969. Cloth, DM. 168.M. M. Willcock - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (01):14-15.
Students of pindar and readers of mitylenaios allusions in Christopher mitylenaios 6 Kurtz.Frederick Lauritzen - 2010 - Byzantion 80:188-196.
AN INTRODUCTION TO PINDAR. R. Stoneman Pindar. Pp. xvi + 232, ills, maps. London and New York: I.B. Tauris, 2014. Paper, £14.99 . ISBN: 978-1-78076-185-5. [REVIEW]Maria Pavlou - 2015 - The Classical Review 65 (2):339-341.
The Ideal Courtier: Pindar and Hieron in Pythian 2.Richard Stoneman - 1984 - Classical Quarterly 34 (01):43-.
Pindar Translated Carl A. P. Ruck and William H. Matheson: Pindar, Selected Odes. Pp. 269. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1968. Cloth, £3·75. [REVIEW]M. M. Willcock - 1971 - The Classical Review 21 (01):13-15.
Myth and History in Pindar Thomas Cole: Pindar's Feasts or the Music of Power. (Filologia e critica, 69.) Pp. 174. Rome: Ateneo, 1992. L. 30,000. [REVIEW]Stephen Instone - 1993 - The Classical Review 43 (02):233-235.
Pindar and Aeschylus - John H. Finley: Pindar and Aeschylus. (Martin Classical Lectures, xiv.) Pp. 307. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press (London: Oxford University Press), 1955. Cloth, 36 s. net. [REVIEW]H. J. Rose - 1957 - The Classical Review 7 (01):18-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
11 (#1,138,639)

6 months
1 (#1,472,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references