A Problem for Fictionalism about Possible Worlds

Analysis 53 (2):71 - 81 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fictionalism about possible worlds is the view that talk about worlds in the analysis of modality is to be construed as ontologically innocent discourse about the content of a fiction. Versions of the view have been defended by D M Armstrong (in "A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility") and by myself (in "Modal Fictionalism', "Mind" 99, July 1990). The present note argues that fictionalist accounts of modality (both Armstrong's version and my own) fail to serve the fictionalists ontological purposes because they imply that as a matter of necessity there exist many worlds

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
207 (#100,570)

6 months
27 (#113,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gideon Rosen
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Go figure: A path through fictionalism.Stephen Yablo - 2001 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25 (1):72–102.
Possible Worlds.Christopher Menzel - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Universals.Chad Carmichael - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (3):373-389.
Modal Fictionalism Fixed.Gideon Rosen - 1995 - Analysis 55 (2):67-73.

View all 40 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Classes are states of affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1991 - Mind 100 (2):189-200.

Add more references