A Defense of Negative Events

Dissertation, Brown University (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation examines the notion of 'negative events'. Examples of negative events are "My not talking to President Reagan now", "The Doctor's not administering the medicine to the patient at time t", etc. ;The first part of my thesis raises the question: 'Are negative events really events'? In order to answer this, we must first define what an 'event' is. I present two major theories of events in the philosophical literature--Roderick Chisholm's 'events as states of affairs' view, and Jaegwon Kim's 'events as property-exemplifications' view. I explain exactly how negative events can be accounted for by each of these two theories and conclude that negative events can be considered genuine events based on these two theories. ;The second chapter of my thesis concerns strategies for the elimination of negative events. It presents the following three arguments against the existence of negative events: The argument from 'incompatibility' and 'otherness' analyses. The argument from demarcation and identity criteria. Phenomenological considerations against negative events. Argument suggests that negative events can be expressed through purely positive determinations, and so there is no need to say that there are negative events. Argument says that negative events are not real events because we cannot intelligibly demarcate one from the other, and genuine events must have this property. Argument argues that strictly negative events are not met with in experience. I will argue that these three arguments , , and are wrong and that we have good reasons for postulating the existence of negative events. ;Chapter three is a section on the limits of negativity. It argues that although there are good reasons for postulating the existence of negative events, there are other sorts of negative entities which we cannot reasonably defend, and so our defense of negative entities must be limited. These problematic entities are objects possessing only negative properties, and the concept of total nothingness. Chapter three, then, sets some limits on the sorts of negative entities which are philosophically defensible

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Events.Roberto Casati & Achille C. Varzi - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Talk I Was Supposed to Give….Achille C. Varzi - 2006 - In Andrea Bottani & Richard Davies (eds.), Modes of Existence: Papers in Ontology and Philosophical Logic. Ontos Verlag. pp. 131–152.
Mancanze, omissioni e descrizioni negative.Achille C. Varzi - 2006 - Rivista di Estetica 32 (2):109-127.
A Defense of Donald Davidson's Theory of Events.Mark Alan Michael - 1987 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Albany
Events.Susan Schneider - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On the Positive and Negative States of Things.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 25 (1):97-106.
The Qu'ran as a Negative Theological Text: The Evidence of Sura II.Aryeh Botwinick - 2007 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2007 (138):69-95.
Events.Frederick F. Schmitt - 1983 - Erkenntnis 20 (3):281 - 293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references