Why all classical theists should believe in physical premotions, but it doesn’t really matter

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 88 (2):139-166 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Physical premotion” is a concept associated with Baroque Catholic theological debates concerning grace and freedom. In this paper, I present an argument that the entities identified in this debate, physical premotions, are necessary for any classical theist’s account of divine causality. A “classical theist” is a theist who holds both that God is simple, that is, without inhering properties, and that humans and God are both free in the incompatibilist sense. In fact, not only does the acceptance of physical premotions not entail determinism, physical premotions are the only way for classical theists to preserve the aforementioned two commitments. Nevertheless, the theory of premotions cannot help theologians resolve questions of how God causes human free acts without violating their freedom.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-15

Downloads
319 (#66,668)

6 months
112 (#42,207)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Dominic Rooney
Hong Kong Baptist University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
From an ontological point of view.John Heil - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 23 references / Add more references