New Essentialism in Biology

Philosophy of Science 77 (5):662-673 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The architects of the modern synthesis banned essentialism from evolutionary theory. This rejection of essentialism was motivated by Darwin’s theory of natural selection, and the continuity of evolutionary transformation. Contemporary evolutionary biology witnesses a renaissance of essentialism in three contexts: “origin essentialism” with respect to species and supraspecific taxa, the bar coding of species on the basis of discontinuities of DNA variation between populations, and the search for laws of evolutionary developmental biology. Such “new essentialism” in contemporary biology must be of a new kind that accommodates relational (extrinsic) properties as historical essences and cluster concepts of natural kinds.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolutionary essentialism.Denis Walsh - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):425-448.
Biological Essentialism.Michael Devitt - 2023 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Typology and Natural Kinds in Evo-Devo.Ingo Brigandt - 2021 - In Nuño De La Rosa Laura & Müller Gerd (eds.), Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide. Springer. pp. 483-493.
What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism.Marc Ereshefsky - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
Devitt’s ‘Intrinsic Biological Essentialism’.Urška Martinc - 2018 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):307-318.
Devitt’s ‘Intrinsic Biological Essentialism’.Zdenka Brzović - 2018 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):307-318.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-29

Downloads
91 (#184,044)

6 months
17 (#204,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Words, Species, and Kinds.J. T. M. Miller - 2021 - Metaphysics 4 (1):18–31.
Why It Is Time To Move Beyond Nagelian Reduction.Marie I. Kaiser - 2012 - In D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), Probabilities, Laws and Structure. Springer. pp. 255-272.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.
The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans & John Mcdowell - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (238):534-538.
Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa.Richard Boyd - 1999 - In Robert Andrew Wilson (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. MIT Press. pp. 141-85.
Scientific Essentialism.Lenny Clapp - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (4):589-594.

View all 28 references / Add more references