- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Epistemic theories and the interpretation of gödel's incompleteness theorems
Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (4):427--74 (1986)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Generalizations of gödel’s incompleteness theorems for ∑n-definable theories of arithmetic.Makoto Kikuchi & Taishi Kurahashi - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):603-616.
Current Research on Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.Yong Cheng - 2021 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):113-167.
On the philosophical relevance of Gödel's incompleteness theorems.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59 (4):513-534.
Incompleteness and Computability: An Open Introduction to Gödel's Theorems.Richard Zach - 2019 - Open Logic Project.
Gödel's incompleteness theorems.C. A. Smorynski - 1977 - In Jon Barwise (ed.), Handbook of mathematical logic. New York: North-Holland. pp. 27.
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems.Panu Raatikainen - 2013 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.).
Torkel Franzén, Gödel's Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to its Use and Abuse. [REVIEW]R. Zach - 2005 - History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (4):369-371.
Gödel's incompleteness theorems and computer science.Roman Murawski - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):123-135.
Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems and Artificial Life.John P. Sullins - 1997 - Society for Philosophy and Technology Quarterly Electronic Journal 2 (3):185-195.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
95 (#185,874)
6 months
9 (#355,594)
2009-01-28
Downloads
95 (#185,874)
6 months
9 (#355,594)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Hyperintensional Ω-Logic.David Elohim - 2019 - In Matteo Vincenzo D'Alfonso & Don Berkich (eds.), On the Cognitive, Ethical, and Scientific Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence. Springer Verlag.
Hyperintensional Ω-Logic.David Elohim - 2019 - In Matteo Vincenzo D'Alfonso & Don Berkich (eds.), On the Cognitive, Ethical, and Scientific Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence. Springer Verlag. pp. 65-82.
Forms of Luminosity: Epistemic Modality and Hyperintensionality in Mathematics.David Elohim - 2017 - Dissertation, Arché, University of St Andrews
Knowledge, Machines, and the Consistency of Reinhardt's Strong Mechanistic Thesis.Timothy J. Carlson - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 105 (1--3):51--82.
Proving that the Mind Is Not a Machine?Johannes Stern - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):81-90.
References found in this work
Minds, Brains, and Programs.John Searle - 1980 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
A logical analysis of some value concepts.Frederic Fitch - 1963 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 28 (2):135-142.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-7qn45 uwo