Discussions notes: Ad hocness and the appraisal of theories

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):355-361 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/29.4.355

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Ad hocness and the appraisal of theories.Michael Redhead - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):355-361.
Discussions: Testability and ‘ ad-hocness ’ of the contraction hypothesis.K. R. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):50-a-50.
Testability and 'ad-hocness' of the contraction hypothesis.K. R. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):50.
Popper's explications of ad hocness: Circularity, empirical content, and scientific practice.Greg Bamford - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):335-355.
Ad Hoc Philosophy of Science.Thomas Johansson - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (2):297-306.
Review. From physics to metaphysics. Michael Redhead. [REVIEW]Peter Forrest - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):149-150.
Review. From physics to metaphysics. Michael Redhead.Peter Forrest - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):149-150.
On Not Counting the Cost: Ad Hocness and Disconfirmation.Lydia McGrew - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (4):491-505.
Ad Hocness in Economics and Popperian Philosophy.D. Wade Hands - 1988 - In Neil de Marchi (ed.), The Popperian Legacy in Economics and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. pp. 121-137.
Discussions notes: A dilemma defended.Geoffrey Sampson - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):353-355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
18 (#201,463)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Redhead
Last affiliation: London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.
A Treatise on Probability.J. M. Keynes - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):219-222.
A treatise on probability.J. Keynes - 1924 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 31 (1):11-12.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262.

View all 12 references / Add more references