Rejoinder to Robert Hartford, "Objectivity and the Proof of Egoism" (Spring 2007): Rand's Metaethics

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):307 - 316 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to Robert Hartford's criticisms of his Spring 2006 Journal of Ayn Rand Studies essay, "Regarding Choice and the Foundations of Morality," Rasmussen argues against "the official" interpretation of Rand's ethics as resting on a basic "choice to live." Drawing from his work with Douglas Den Uyl, Rasmussen argues that Rand's metaethics is best understood in "biocentric," neo-Aristotelian terms: that human choice does not set the context in which it operates and that "man's life qua man" is the natural end of human life

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rand on Obligation and Value.Douglas B. Rasmussen - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):69 - 86.
Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Rand the Moderate.Alexander Tabarrok - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):457 - 467.
Liberty and nature: The missing link.Gregory R. Johnson - 1999 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (1):135 - 166.
Eudaimon in the Rough: Perfecting Rand’s Egoism.Roger E. Bissell - 2020 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 20 (2):452-478.
Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Another Look at Abortion.Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):449 - 456.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
21 (#762,792)

6 months
7 (#491,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas B. Rasmussen
St. John's University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references