Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Rand the Moderate

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):457 - 467 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alexander Tabarrok argues that Gregory Johnson and David Rasmussen (in their essay, "Rand on Abortion: A Critique," Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, Spring 2000) misconstrue Rand's theory of individual rights and her position on abortion. Rand's views fit neatly within her Aristotelian philosophic framework. Moreover, Tabarrok defends Rand's views on the family as reasonable and well within the feminist mainstream

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rejoinder to Machan and Tabarrok: Rand on Abortion, Revisited.Gregory R. Johnson & David Rasmussen - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):469 - 485.
Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Another Look at Abortion.Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):449 - 456.
Rand on abortion: A critique.Gregory R. Johnson & David Rasmussen - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (2):245 - 261.
Liberty and nature: The missing link.Gregory R. Johnson - 1999 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (1):135 - 166.
Reply to Douglas B. Rasmussen, "Rand on Obligation and Value" (Fall 2002) and Eric Mack, "Problematic Arguments in Randian Ethics" (Fall 2003): Rand and Choice. [REVIEW]Tibor R. Machan - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (2):257 - 273.
Rejoinder to Robert Hartford, "Objectivity and the Proof of Egoism" (Spring 2007): Rand's Metaethics.Douglas B. Rasmussen - 2007 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):307 - 316.
Rand on Obligation and Value.Douglas B. Rasmussen - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):69 - 86.
Reply to Stephen R. C. Hicks, "Egoism in Nietzsche and Rand" (Spring 2009): Egoism in Nietzsche and Rand: A Somewhat Different Approach.Lester Hunt - 2009 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 10 (2):293 - 312.
Rejoinder to Tibor R. Machan, "Rand and Choice" (Spring 2006): Regarding Choice and the Foundation of Morality: Reflections on Rand's Ethics.Douglas B. Rasmussen - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (2):309 - 328.
Ayn Rand in the Scholarly Literature. [REVIEW]Gregory R. Johnson & Chris Matthew Sciabarra - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):165 - 169.
Ayn Rand and Deducing 'Ought' from 'Is'.Lachlan Doughney - 2012 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 12 (1):151-168.
Rejoinder to Greg Nyquist, "Rand and Empirical Responsibility" (Fall 2006): Nyquist Contra Rand, Part II.Fred Seddon - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (1):121 - 122.
Reply to Fred Seddon, "Nyquist Contra Rand" (Spring 2003): Rand and Empirical Responsibility.Greg Nyquist - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (1):111 - 119.
Reply to Tibor R. Machan, "Rand and Choice" (Spring 2006), Eric Mack, "More Problematic Arguments in Randian Ethics" (Spring 2006), and Douglas B. Rasmussen, "Regarding Choice and the Foundation of Morality: Reflections on Rand's Ethics" (Spring 2006): Objectivity and the Proof of Egoism. [REVIEW]Robert Hartford - 2007 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):291 - 303.
Rejoinder to Thomas and Vacker: Ayn Rand and the Mastery of Nature.Gregory R. Johnson - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (1):229 - 240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
6 (#1,425,536)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

When “A Is Not A”: Reflections on a Conversation.Kathleen Touchstone - 2017 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 17 (2):238-274.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references