The redemption of science

Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):157 - 165 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The appearance of nuclear weapons suddenly made the extinction of humanity a distinct possibility. In view of this obverse side of scientific progress, attitudes toward science in the general population became ambivalent, at times bordering on hostility. It is argued that to a great extent the scientists themselves are responsible for the tarnished image of science. Accordingly they should restore science to its role of furthering human welfare and, above all, as a source of enlightenment. In our age enlightenment entails emancipating humanity from superstitions generated by the cooptation of science in the service of power.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science without laws.Ronald N. Giere - 1999 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Scientists and war.Solly Zuckerman Zuckerman - 1967 - New York,: Harper & Row.
On “bettering humanity” in science and engineering education.James A. Stieb - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):265-273.
Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?K. Brad Wray - 2003 - Social Studies of Science 33 (1):137-49.
Is the philosophy of science scientific?A. Cornelius Benjamin - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (4):351-358.
Does Science Provide Us with the Methodological Key to Wisdom?Nicholas Maxwell - 2012 - Philosophia, First Part of 'Arguing for Wisdom in the University' 40 (4):664-673.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#513,686)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references