Early Buddhism I: Metaethics (Ethics-1, M-30)
In A. Raghuramaraju (ed.), Philosophy, E-PG Pathshala. Delhi: India, Department of Higher Education (NMEICT) (2016)
Abstract
Metaethics is that part of moral philosophy that is interested in the conceptual resolution of the relationship between the RIGHT and the GOOD. Metaethics is, hence, one step removed from practical questions of how to live—but not disconnected from them. Our investigation will begin with the early Buddhist account of language as meaningful for intersubjective reasons. This gives rise to a critical awareness of the correspondence between linguistic meaning and reality. The correspondence is outside of our control, but also structured by our own intersubjective purposes. Hence, a proper appreciation of reality involves an appreciation of the causal interdependency of what we refer to. This, in turn, gives rise to an appreciation of intentional action – karma – as a special case of the general metaphysical principle: dependent origination. While our subjective desires may fail to correspond to reality, our choices constitute our contribution to causality. Some of these contributions can be good, and others are bad. The implication for our own self is that our character itself is constituted by our choices. The result is that we have little reason to believe in a permanent self, characterised by unchanging personal characteristics. Positive change that takes us away from error of a subjective approach to reality can be characterised as a void (nirvāṇa) outside of the ordinary practice of linguistic categorisation.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Transcendence, Ineffability and Nirvana: An Analysis of the Relation Between Religious Experience and Language According to Early Buddhism.Asanga Tilakaratne - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Hawai'i
Early Buddhism II: Applied Ethics (Ethics-1, M31).Shyam Ranganathan - 2016 - In A. Raghuramaraju (ed.), Philosophy, E-PG Pathshala. Delhi: India, Department of Higher Education (NMEICT).
Buddhism, Karma, and Immortality.Bruce Reichenbach - 1987 - In Paaul Badham & Linda Badham (eds.), Death and Immortality in the Religions of the World. New York: Paragon House Publishers. pp. 141-157.
Nirvana and Ineffability a Study of the Buddhist Theory of Reality and Language.Asanga Tilakaratne - 1993
Ethics and Reality (Ethics-1, M06).Shyam Ranganathan - 2016 - In A. Raghuramaraju (ed.), Philosophy, E-PG Pathshala. Delhi: India, Department of Higher Education (NMEICT).
The 'Radically Empiricist' Interpretation of Early Buddhist Nirvāṇa.Gary Doore - 1979 - Religious Studies 15 (1):65 - 70.
Linguistic Knowledge of Reality: A Metaphysical Impossibility?J. Nescolarde-Selva, J. L. Usó-Doménech & M. J. Sabán - 2015 - Foundations of Science 20 (1):27-58.
Explanation and Reality in Linguistics.Michael Devitt - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):203-231.
Philosophy of language for metaethics.Mark Schroeder - 2012 - In Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Routledge.
In the Hope of Nibb⁻Ana: The Ethics of Therav⁻Ada Buddhism.Winston L. King - 2001 - Pariyatti Press.
Reconsidering Ordinary Language Philosophy: Malcolm’s (Moore’s) Ordinary Language Argument.Sally Parker-Ryan - 2010 - Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):123-149.
Prāsaṅgika’s Semantic Nominalism: Reality is Linguistic Concept.Sonam Thakchoe - 2012 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (4):427-452.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-01-03
Downloads
5 (#1,169,683)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
2017-01-03
Downloads
5 (#1,169,683)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
Historical graph of downloads