Uncovering the Structure of Semantic Representations Using a Computational Model of Decision‐Making

Cognitive Science 47 (1):e13234 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to logical theories of meaning, a meaning of an expression can be formalized and encoded in truth conditions. Vagueness of the language and individual differences between people are a challenge to incorporate into the meaning representations. In this paper, we propose a new approach to study truth-conditional representations of vague concepts. For a case study, we selected two natural language quantifiers most and more than half. We conducted two online experiments, each with 90 native English speakers. In the first experiment, we tested between-subjects variability in meaning representations. In the second experiment, we tested the stability of meaning representations over time by testing the same group of participants in two experimental sessions. In both experiments, participants performed the verification task. They verified a sentence with a quantifier (e.g., “Most of the gleerbs are feezda.”) based on the numerical information provided in the second sentence, (e.g., “60% of the gleerbs are feezda”). To investigate between-subject and within-subject differences in meaning representations, we proposed an extended version of the Diffusion Decision Model with two parameters capturing truth conditions and vagueness. We fit the model to responses and reaction times data. In the first experiment, we found substantial between-subject differences in representations of most as reflected by the variability in the truth conditions. Moreover, we found that the verification of most is proportion-dependent as reflected in the reaction time effect and model parameter. In the second experiment, we showed that quantifier representations are stable over time as reflected in stable model parameters across two experimental sessions. These findings challenge semantic theories that assume the truth-conditional equivalence of most and more than half and contribute to the representational theory of vague concepts. The current study presents a promising approach to study semantic representations, which can have a wide application in experimental linguistics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semantic Properties and the Computational Model of Mind.Randall Kirk Campbell - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Semantic behavior and decision making.William James Williams - 1978 - Ann Arbor, Mich.: Published for Center for Public Affairs, University of Southern California by University Microfilms International.
The many futures of a decision.Jay Lampert - 2018 - London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-22

Downloads
21 (#732,808)

6 months
12 (#208,725)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Shane Steinert-Threlkeld
University of Washington
Jakub Szymanik
University of Amsterdam

References found in this work

Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.Jon Barwise - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159.
The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics.Stanislas Dehaene - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):201-203.
Prototype theory and compositionality.H. Kamp - 1995 - Cognition 57 (2):129-191.
Prototype theory and compositionality.H. Kamp & B. Partee - 1995 - Cognition 57 (2):129-191.

View all 12 references / Add more references