Model Organisms for Studying Decision-Making: A Phylogenetically Expanded Perspective

Philosophy of Science 88 (5):1055-1066 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the use of model organisms in studying the cognitive phenomenon of decision-making. Drawing on the framework of biological control to develop a skeletal conception of decision-making, we show that two core features of decision-making mechanisms can be identified by studying model organisms, such as E. coli, jellyfish, C. elegans, lamprey, and so on. First, decision mechanisms are distributed and heterarchically structured. Second, they depend heavily on chemical information processing, such as that involving neuromodulators. We end by discussing the implications for studying distinctively human decision-making.

Similar books and articles

Grounding cognition: heterarchical control mechanisms in biology.William Bechtel & Leonardo Bich - 2021 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376 (1820).
The role of rules in ethical decision making.Eugene C. Hargrove - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):3 – 42.
Quantum Random Walks and Decision Making.Karthik H. Shankar - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):108-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-03

Downloads
354 (#54,069)

6 months
110 (#32,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Linus Huang
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Leonardo Bich
University of the Basque Country
William Bechtel
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
Explanation: a mechanist alternative.William Bechtel & Adele Abrahamsen - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (2):421-441.
Model Organisms are Not (Theoretical) Models.Arnon Levy & Adrian Currie - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):327-348.

View all 8 references / Add more references