The Principle of Four-Cornered Negation in Indian Philosophy

Review of Metaphysics 7 (4):694 - 713 (1954)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Those philosophers who gave a negative answer to all four questions were called "eel-wrigglers" by the Buddhists. It was impossible to fix their position either for approval or for rejection. They would criticize any view, positive or negative, but would not themselves hold any. And it was difficult for a serious person to enter into any controversy with them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empirical Negation.Michael De - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (1):49-69.
Indian tradition and negation.K. N. Upadhyaya - 1988 - Philosophy East and West 38 (3):281-289.
The nyāya on cognition and negation.J. L. Shaw - 1980 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 8 (3):279-302.
Negation and the buddhist theory of meaning.J. L. Shaw - 1978 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 6 (1):59-77.
Double negation in Buddhist logic.Hans G. Herzberger - 1975 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 3 (1-2):3-16.
Negation, Denial, and Rejection.David Ripley - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (9):622-629.
Elements of Indian aesthetics.S. N. Ghoshal - 1978 - Varanasi: Chaukhambha Orientalia.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
94 (#179,520)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Partiality and its dual.J. Michael Dunn - 2000 - Studia Logica 66 (1):5-40.
The logic of the catuskoti.Graham Priest - 2010 - Comparative Philosophy 1 (2):24-54.
Nāgārjuna’s Catuṣkoṭi.Jan Westerhoff - 2006 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (4):367-395.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references