Idempotent Full Paraconsistent Negations are not Algebraizable

Abstract

1 What are the features of a paraconsistent negation? Since paraconsistent logic was launched by da Costa in his seminal paper [4], one of the fundamental problems has been to determine what exactly are the theoretical or metatheoretical properties of classical negation that can have a unary operator not obeying the principle of noncontradiction, that is, a paraconsistent operator. What the result presented here shows is that some of these properties are not compatible with each other, so that in constructing a paraconsistent negation as close as possible to classical negation, we have to make a choice among classical properties compatible with the idea of paraconsistency. In particular, there is no paraconsistent negation more classical than all the others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Idempotent Full Paraconsistent Negations are not Algebraizable.Jean-Yves Béziau - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (1):135-139.
Yes, Virginia, there really are paraconsistent logics.Bryson Brown - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):489-500.
Contradiction and contrariety. Priest on negation.Heinrich Wansing - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):81-93.
Paraconsistency Everywhere.Greg Restall - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (3):147-156.
Absurdity as unary operator.Sergei P. Odintsov - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):225-242.
A Paraconsistent Model of Vagueness.Z. Weber - 2010 - Mind 119 (476):1025-1045.
Some paraconsistent sentential calculi.Jerzy J. Błaszczuk - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (1-2):51 - 61.
Ideal Paraconsistent Logics.O. Arieli, A. Avron & A. Zamansky - 2011 - Studia Logica 99 (1-3):31-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
47 (#329,840)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Trivial Dialetheism and the Logic of Paradox.Jean-Yves Beziau - 2016 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 25 (1):51-56.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Calculus for Antinomies.F. G. Asenjo - 1966 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16 (1):103-105.
Logic of Paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219-241.
Every quotient algebra for $C_1$ is trivial.Chris Mortensen - 1980 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21 (4):694-700.
Paraconsistency and the $\rm C$-systems of da Costa.Igor Urbas - 1989 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (4):583-597.
Paraconsistency and C1.Chris Mortensen - 1989 - In G. Priest, R. Routley & J. Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent. Philosophia Verlag. pp. 289--305.

View all 6 references / Add more references