‘Limited but useful’: Datafied Brains and Digital Twins

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 29 (1):47-48 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ivery much appreciated the thoughtful response to my Datafied brains and digital twins: lessons from industry, caution for psychiatry provided by Douglas W. Heinrichs. I am encouraged that we differ merely in emphasis among the issues upon which we share a wider understanding.In his response, Assessing the Dangers of the Next Reductionist Fantasy, Heinrichs elaborates upon an underemphasized dimension in my Digital Twin article. Heinrichs approaches this dimension through “a semantic understanding of scientific theorizing.” According to this understanding, all science is fundamentally concerned with model making, and testing of models whose efficacy is evaluated on an adaptable basis relating to factors including...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assessing the Dangers of the Next Reductionist Fantasy.Douglas W. Heinrichs - 2022 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 29 (1):43-45.
Gloomy duck or cheerful rabbit?Christine Tappolet & Bruce Maxwell - 2012 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 19 (1):21-23.
Near-term ethical challenges of digital twins.Brent Mittelstadt - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (6):405-406.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-23

Downloads
14 (#993,837)

6 months
5 (#836,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Rainey
Oxford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references