Philosophy of Science and Scientific Whaling: Lost in Translation

Abstract

Through discussing scientific whaling, the paper brings the necessity of retrieving natural philosophy. The paper’s arguments favor an expanded vision of human encounter with nature, through the lens of natural philosophy, with a priority focus of expanding our imaginations to embrace the vast natural world. There is no doubt that both the philosophy and science, two of the three significant areas of cultural and intellectual engagement (the other one is religion), have gone through changes over time. It is also conspicuous that the modern natural science marginalized and suppressed specific concerns which were previously an indefeasible part of natural philosophy. Bringing both historical and critical discussion of natural philosophy, the paper explores prospective retrieval of natural philosophy in contemporary modern science. Emphasizing the significance of natural philosophy’s imperatives both in the intellectual and field application of modern science, the paper reiterates commentary of Nicholas Maxwell, who advocates to correct three loopholes (Maxwell 2017): change the nature of social inquiry; opt aim-oriented rationality methods; and generalize the progress achieving methods of science.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Cultural Whaling, Commodification, and Culture Change.Ronnie Hawkins - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (3):287-306.
What’s Wrong With Aim-Oriented Empiricism?Nicholas Maxwell - 2015 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 3 (2):5-31.
A New Task for Philosophy of Science.Nicholas Maxwell - 2019 - Metaphilosophy 50 (3):316-338.
Whaling intelligence: news, facts and US-American exploration in the Pacific.Felix Lüttge - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Science 52 (3):425-445.
“Do We Need a Scientific Revolution.Nicholas Maxwell - 2008 - Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-04

Downloads
102 (#169,816)

6 months
102 (#43,632)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mohammad Rubaiyat Rahman
University of Texas at El Paso

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Darwin's Dangerous Idea.Daniel Dennett - 1994 - Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):169-174.
Animals and why they matter.Mary Midgley - 1983 - Athens: University of Georgia Press.
In Praise of Natural Philosophy: A Revolution for Thought and Life.Nicholas Maxwell - 2017 - Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references