Merely Confused Supposition

Franciscan Studies 40 (1):265-97 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the notion of merely confused supposition as it arose in the medieval theory of suppositio personalis. The context of our analysis is our formalization of William of Ockham's theory of supposition sketched in Mind 86 (1977), 109-13. The present paper is, however, self-contained, although we assume a basic acquaintance with supposition theory. The detailed aims of the paper are: to look at the tasks that supposition theory took on itself and to use our formalization to relate them to more modern ideas; to explain the notion of merely confused supposition and to defend it against certain criticisms; and to discuss two issues closely related to the idea of merely confused supposition which we could not broach in a shorter article: the mode of supposition of terms in intensional contexts, and the possible existence of a fourth mode, often called suppositio copulatim

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-11

Downloads
1,421 (#7,736)

6 months
96 (#47,543)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center
Stephen Read
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Lessons from pseudo scotus.Graham Priest & Richard Routley - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 42 (2):189 - 199.
Distributive Terms, Truth, and the Port Royal Logic.John N. Martin - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):133-154.
The logical form of categorical sentences.Alex Orenstein - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):517 – 533.
La regola del descensus. Un esempio di procedura logica di prova nel Medioevo.Alfredo Di Giorgio - 2013 - In Alfredo Di Giorgio & Daniele Chiffi (eds.), Prova e Giustificazione. Torino TO, Italia: pp. 19-50.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references