Ockham's supposition theory and modern logic

Philosophical Review 73 (1):91-99 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philotheus boehner's "medieval logic" gives the impression that medieval supposition theory and modern quantification theory agree on their interpretation of particular propositions but differ on their interpretation of universal propositions. Matthews shows that this impression is mistaken: they differ on both particular and universal propositions, And the basic reason is that the medievals quantify over terms while modern logicians quantify over variables. (staff)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ockham: studies and selections.Stephen Chak Tornay - 1938 - La Salle, Ill.,: The Open court publishing company. Edited by William.
An intensional interpretation of ockham's theory of supposition.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 365-393.
O-propositions and Ockham's theory of supposition.Alfred J. Freddoso - 1979 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20 (4):741-750.
What does Ockham mean by `supposition'?Marilyn McCord Adams - 1976 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (3):375-391.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
81 (#206,034)

6 months
18 (#140,036)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references