Bill of Rights for Research Subjects

, , , &
IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (2):7 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/3564581

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Case of Two Devices: Disclosure to Subjects Following Phase IV ("Post-Marketing") Research.James R. Anderson, Andrew Jameton, Paul J. Reitemeier & Ernest Prentice - 1995 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 17 (3):6.
An Update on the PEG-SOD Study Involving Incompetent Subjects: FDA Permits an Exception to Informed Consent Requirements.Ernest D. Prentice, L. Antonson, Lyal G. Leibrock, Vikram C. Prabhu, Timothy K. Kelso & Thomas D. Sears - 1994 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (1/2):16.
A bill of rights for human subjects of research: a proto-draft.L. B. Cebik - 1990 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (1):25-33.
Waiving legal rights in research.David B. Resnik & Efthimios Parasidis - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):475-478.
A Bill of Rights for Human Subjects of Research.L. B. Cebik - 1993 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 8 (1):25-33.
The bill of rights debate: why the New Zealand bill of rights act 1990 is a bad model for Britain.A. Butler - 1997 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17 (2):323-346.
The Ability of Minors to Define and Recognize Their Rights in Research.Jean-Marie B. Rau - 1997 - Dissertation, Fordham University
Problems in the Bill of Rights of the United States.Su-lan Zhao - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:50-56.
Can Children Be Enrolled in a Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Synthetic Growth Hormone?Ernest D. Prentice, L. Antonson, Andrew Jameton, Benjamin Graber & Thomas Sears - 1989 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (1):6.
Guinea Pig Duties: 7. Contingent Rights of Patients in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (3):85-91.
The Ethical Treatment of Research Assistants: Are We Forsaking Safety for Science?Karen Z. Naufel & Denise R. Beike - 2013 - Journal of Research Practice 9 (2):Article M11 (proof).
Entrenching bills of rights.Macklem Timothy - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1):107-129.
The Mental Capacity Bill 2004: Human Rights Concerns.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2005 - Family Law Journal 35:137-143.
IRB Review of a Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial Involving Incompetent Patients Suffering from Severe Closed Head Injury. [REVIEW]Ernest D. Prentice, L. Antonson, Lyal G. Leibrock, Timothy K. Kelso & Thomas D. Sears - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (5):1.
Rights, responsibilities, and respect: A balanced citizenship model for schools of business. [REVIEW]Cam Caldwell, Stephen E. Clapham & Brian Davis - 2007 - Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (1):105-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-28

Downloads
11 (#1,137,779)

6 months
9 (#308,642)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Paul Reitemeier
Andrew Jameton
Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references