The Mental Capacity Bill 2004: Human Rights Concerns

Family Law Journal 35:137-143 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Mental Capacity Bill endangers the vulnerable by inviting human rights abuse. It is perhaps these grave deficiencies that prompted the warnings of the 23rd Report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights highlighting the failure of the legislation to supply adequate safeguards against Articles 2, 3 and 8 incompatibilities. Further, the fact that it is the mentally incapacitated as a class that are thought ripe for these and other kinds of intervention, highlights the Article 14 discrimination inherent in this and related legislation. The financial, medical and research interests that underpin the legislation highlight how the legilsation endangers the ulnerable. It appears to be both a responsibility shifting exercise. Most alarmingly of all, efforts to permit non-therapeutic research on the non-consenting vulnerable as well as sterilisation and abortion on those who do not consent suggest that the legislation heralds a new era o gross human rights abuse in instutions around the UK.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disabled Need Our Protection.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2004 - Law Society Gazette 101:12.
The Global Reach of Human Rights.Amartya Sen - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):91-100.
Human rights and healthcare.Elizabeth Wicks - 2007 - Portland, Or.: Hart.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-15

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacqueline A. Laing
Oxford University (DPhil)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references