Learning Concepts: A Learning-Theoretic Solution to the Complex-First Paradox

Philosophy of Science 87 (1):135-151 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Children acquire complex concepts like DOG earlier than simple concepts like BROWN, even though our best neuroscientific theories suggest that learning the former is harder than learning the latter and, thus, should take more time (Werning 2010). This is the Complex- First Paradox. We present a novel solution to the Complex-First Paradox. Our solution builds on a generalization of Xu and Tenenbaum’s (2007) Bayesian model of word learning. By focusing on a rational theory of concept learning, we show that it is easier to infer the meaning of complex concepts than that of simple concepts.

Similar books and articles

The essence of mentalistic agents.Shaun Nichols - 2017 - Synthese 194 (3):809-825.
Conceptual Development and the Paradox of Learning.Michael Luntley - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):1-14.
Conceptual development and the paradox of learning.Michael Luntley - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):1-14.
The origins of concepts.Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):359 - 384.
The Logic of Learning.Christian Bennet - 2019 - Axiomathes 29 (2):173-187.
From Sensations to Concepts: a Proposal for Two Learning Processes.Peter Gärdenfors - 2019 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10 (3):441-464.


Added to PP

163 (#79,214)

6 months
58 (#22,737)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nina Poth
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Peter Brössel
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Citations of this work

Add more citations